In the unfortunate event that you or a loved one falls victim to medical malpractice, you have the right to sue your doctor. However, if they do not carry malpractice insurance, you have a long and complex legal process ahead of you. Rossman Law Group will advocate for you and answer the vital question: is it worth it to sue doctors with no malpractice insurance?
Make sure you have a case for a medical malpractice suit. Malpractice covers four legal elements. First, you must prove that the doctor owed you a professional duty and a certain standard of care. Second, provide evidence that the doctor breached or neglected that duty. Third, keep a record of all illnesses and injuries you suffered due to that neglect. Finally, lay out all the damages that that neglect caused, both economic and emotional.
The individual doctor who committed the medical error may not have malpractice insurance, but the hospital may have liability insurance to compensate you. Contact an attorney who specializes in medical malpractice to navigate the often frustrating complexities of that insurance. You may be able to sue the hospital itself as a co-defendant.
With the help of a seasoned attorney, you can bring your case before a judge up to two years after the alleged malpractice occurred. Rossman Law Group provides top-tier medical malpractice lawyers in Boise, Idaho, to identify all liable parties and guide you through your suit. Idaho places a $400,000 cap on non-economic damages (such as physical pain and suffering and emotional harm). There is no concrete cap on economic damages like medical bills.
Whether you should sue your doctor for malpractice is your decision; make it an informed one. It can absolutely be worth it to sue a doctor with no insurance as long as you have an experienced attorney on your side. Rossman Law Group has the answer to the question, “Is it worth it to sue doctors with no malpractice insurance?” That answer is a resounding yes.